This is precisely the kind of fake-science demagoguery that I was afraid would start showing up regarding GamerGate:http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2014/10/science-gamergate-video-games-violence …
-
-
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori This sort of ignorance first showed up in the femfreq on "background decoration", and that was very disheartening.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori And I am unfortunately sure that this sort of thing will continue to propagate further :(2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori Can't people be against misogyny in the industry and in the culture without relying on bad soft-science research?3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori This is not a scientific question, it is cultural. Bringing what you think is "science" into it makes real science people angry.2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
I've managed to upset myself again :( I am back to thinking both sides of the GamerGate thing are bad for games as an art form.
4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori Games as an art form? Ahh very clever Casey. Get the people off GamerGate and back to the "are games art?" argument.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@shownunbattoe Ain't no argument. They are art :P
-
-
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori I agree. Doesn't mean it ain't an argument on the internet :^)0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.