@Jonathan_Blow @cmuratori different problems required different tools. Like, modeling business domains vs what you do.
-
-
Replying to @ShawnMcCool
@ShawnMcCool@Jonathan_Blow CPUs only do one thing, though. Programming them properly is rarely about the domain.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@Jonathan_Blow I guess this is where you and I could not possible disagree any more.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ShawnMcCool
@ShawnMcCool@Jonathan_Blow Well, if you've got a CPU that primarily does something other than modify memory, I'd love to see it :P1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@Jonathan_Blow Ok, I see now that you're talking about a very low-level of programming.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ShawnMcCool
@ShawnMcCool@Jonathan_Blow I don't really see programming as being "high level" or "low level". There is only programming.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cmuratori
@ShawnMcCool@Jonathan_Blow If a "high level" construct actually produces good code, then it's just "good programming".1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@ShawnMcCool@Jonathan_Blow But usually "high level" actually just means bad programming, because the code that comes out is big and slow.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@ShawnMcCool @Jonathan_Blow So it's actually not about _programming_, it's about he programmer wanting to save themselves time.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.