OOP programmers love indirection so much, they went ahead and made an acronym of their acronyms: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SOLID_(object-oriented_design) … (via @won3d)
-
-
-
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@Jonathan_Blow@won3d uhm, have you looked at the source code? I wouldn't call it 'easy' to maintain or extend :-/2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @logicalerror
@logicalerror@Jonathan_Blow@won3d I go by what happens, not by what I think of the source code. Personally, I find it terrifying...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@logicalerror@Jonathan_Blow@won3d ... but obviously it must work for the people who code on it, because it has made excellent progress.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@Jonathan_Blow@won3d sure, but is that because OOP made it easy, or despite it's using OOP (or somewhere in between)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @logicalerror
@logicalerror@Jonathan_Blow@won3d Well that's the thing, right - we don't have any scientific way to tell these things.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@logicalerror@Jonathan_Blow@won3d But we definitely _can_ say that LLVM is _heavily_ OOP, and it's gone very well.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@logicalerror @Jonathan_Blow @won3d So it's certainly possible to have a non-imploding project. Seemingly not likely, but _possible_ :P
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.