@ZoltanStal @gpakosz I had to read that passage like five times to even figure out specifically what is and is not buildable with 2012.
-
-
Replying to @cmuratori
@ZoltanStal
@gpakosz And to make matters worse, it's not even specific to 2012 as a package, it's specific to which _update_ you have!!3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori @zoltanstal MS is the vendor that cares the most about backward compatibility. Others expect you to upgrade, and people do so1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@gpakosz @ZoltanStal A) Microsoft has not shipped backwards compatible operating system since, like, XP at best.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@gpakosz @ZoltanStal B) This is _forwards compatibility_ we're talking about here, so backwards compatibility has nothing to do with it.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori @zoltanstal It was only few months XP reaches end of support. Yet there was an uproar which wouldn't have happened e.g. on Mac1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@gpakosz @ZoltanStal ... and then says "But APPLE does it!" Well I use (or used to use) MS products _because_ they were better than Apple!1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @cmuratori
@gpakosz @ZoltanStal Now they are actively worse than Apple most of the time and they wonder why nobody buys their new operating systems :(2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@gpakosz @ZoltanStal Well the answer is because they f'ing suck! They don't offer any of the things that used to be valuable about Windows.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.