-
-
Replying to @cmuratori
@nothings@dwenius It's equivalent to researchers can inject people with poison as long as they inject and equivalent number with medicine.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@nothings@dwenius Research is not about ensuring "zero sum". It is about doing no harm _to individuals_, not in aggregate.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@dwenius That's not true at all, you can test a drug that might harm someone. That's why the focus is on informed consent.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nothings
@cmuratori@dwenius Like I said, this thing's terrible (I posted negatively about it before you). But the angle you're taking is ineffective1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@dwenius The need for informed consent applies whether anyone is at risk of suicide or not. Arguments re: suicide a distraction.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@dwenius They're probably legally covered for liability by the Facebook terms of service. This is just about psych test ethics.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.