-
-
Replying to @cmuratori
@nothings@LiaSae Judicial review of "silence" in contracts actually does depend on whether or not there is a "public good" being served.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@nothings@LiaSae To the best of my knowledge, that is _not_ true for non-news/criticism functions. Or at least I've never heard of it.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@LiaSae You've never heard of dozens of cases reported in press where people are forbidden from publishing performance stats, etc1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@LiaSae No. I'm talking about it having been in contracts discussed on the web. "Incidents" didn't fit in 140 characters.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @cmuratori
@nothings@LiaSae My point is that there are very stringent legal standards for what a consumer could sign away in a EULA.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@nothings@LiaSae I don't think there's any precedent for nullifying a clause like "you may not make performances using this work".2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.