@cmuratori @LiaSae Also, 3 very diff things: TotalBiscuit-y reviews, Minecraft-as-medium "performances", content-exhausting Let's Plays.
-
-
Replying to @nothings
@cmuratori@LiaSae The first should pretty clearly be fair use, the second is a derivative work, the third is the non-grey copyright viol4n.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@LiaSae I don't think that's relevant at this point, as the Youtube and DCMA stuff happens because of copyright, not the license.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nothings
@cmuratori@LiaSae Would it become relevant if the copyright doesn't go the creators way? Sure.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@nothings@LiaSae That's the performance-in-Minecraft situation. Copyright isn't the important part of the law then, it's the contract.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@LiaSae A hypothetical contract could say anything, but we're not talking about hypothetical contracts.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nothings
@cmuratori@LiaSae Since (IMO) the 2nd case is creating a derivative work, UNLESS the contract says otherwise, copyright law applies.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.