Also, a little blast from the past I was reminded of while wading through @femfreq's recent "science" references: http://articles.latimes.com/2012/jul/13/news/la-ol-blowback-pscyhology-science-20120713 …
-
-
Replying to @cmuratori
@hoskingc The problem is that when you say, "science has determines X", if you aren't talking about the scientific method, it's different.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@hoskingc It means that you actually haven't determined X at all, you've just done something that made you think maybe X happens.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@hoskingc The distinction is critical, because it separates what is actually true from what is merely people pontificating.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@hoskingc Psychology is 100% pontification currently. So when it is called science, and referred to as if it is truth, it is harmful.
3:07 PM - 18 Jun 2014
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.