This month's Wired is weird. Its cover glorifies Palmer Lucky, but its article correctly attributes all the VR advances to Valve...
-
-
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori If only you knew someone with all the actual facts at their disposal.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tom_forsyth
@tom_forsyth My problem is that I've heard the entire story from almost every participant now, and they're all a bit different :P1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori All the versions that don't involve the words "and then Tom showed me how to do it properly" are clearly delusional.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tom_forsyth
@tom_forsyth Well, right, there's an implied "and it was all fucked up until Tom showed up and fixed everything" after all them :P1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori Well obviously. You know all these folks - they'd die of thirst if I didn't open soda cans for them.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @tom_forsyth
@tom_forsyth The release name of the product will be "Tom Forsyth presents The Oculus Rift", right? It's a Sid Meier sort of branding.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori What? Palmer's still getting an "executive producer" credit. After Zuck. I'm not a complete bastard you know.2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
@tom_forsyth "Tom Fosyth presents... a Palmer Lucky presentation... of Mark Zuckerberg's OCULUS RIFT... featuring Atman Binstock..."
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.