@GMShivers Quality of life has very little bearing on _where your economy is heading_.
-
-
Replying to @cmuratori
@GMShivers Wealth inequality does. Wealth inequality, if unchecked, eventually destroys your economy. That is the point here.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori but there's nothing you can do about that. The inevitability is that once it gets to that point it will crash.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GMShivers
@GMShivers Oh there's plenty you can do about it. This is why the right tax code structure is redistributive.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori Everyone paying more taxes from bottom to top is what works, not just ensuring that "Richies" are penalized, that does the opposi1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GMShivers
@GMShivers Literally no. All our highest growth periods correlate with high taxes at the top. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/15/top-marginal-tax-rates-chart_n_849596.html …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori Those have already been proven to be divorced from the taxes themselves, and the high taxes precluded a period of decline.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori It's a case of correlation not causation.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GMShivers
@GMShivers But you specifically said that it was a case of _causation_ in the other direction. I'm saying that's obviously not true.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@GMShivers Also, where is the proof that it _isn't_ causative? You said it had "already been proven". Citation?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.