And regarding that "Measuring Reproducibility in Computer Systems Research" paper I just retweeted, start with the Anecdotes appendix.
@rygorous @Jonathan_Blow @nothings They should have to add that to their comparison images...
-
-
@rygorous@Jonathan_Blow@nothings "Fig 7. The algorithm as described in the paper (left), and as hacked to produce good results (right)." -
@cmuratori@Jonathan_Blow@nothings The classics are: 1. code getting tweaked well past pub deadline, so it's newer/"better" than paper ver. - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.