@cmuratori because US drones kill Taliban as well. Are you OK with that and against them killing Al Qaeda in The Yemen?
-
-
Replying to @NickCharnock
@NickCharnock I am not OK with any of our drone strikes currently, but that is a separate issue. This issue is about indictment.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@NickCharnock I simply argue that for the President to order a specific person executed (as in this case), they should be indicted first.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@NickCharnock The reason for this is to protect the innocent. For example, the next drone strike after Al-awlaki was his 16-year-old son.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@NickCharnock Nobody, not even our government, has ever accused him of any crime whatsoever, let alone of being involved with Al Qaeda.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori they don't have time to get an indicted first. Because the target will move before they can get it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NickCharnock
@NickCharnock Nope. They had been after Aw-awlaki for _years_. They even had the Yemen dictatorship lock him up in Yemeni prison.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@NickCharnock They could have indicted him years ago. They simply don't care. They'd rather just decide to kill you whenever they want.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.