Pursuant to my previous tweets, it appears that Moore's Law's expected death is only 5 years away anyway: http://www.extremetech.com/computing/165331-intels-former-chief-architect-moores-law-will-be-dead-within-a-decade …
-
-
@cmuratori it would be fun to imagine the same gains being made up for on the software side. -
@ArmyOfBruce It does seem likely that the future of computing will lean more heavily on the software engineering than the hardware now. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@cmuratori Also what tech will win eventually ? aka at which point nanotech and such will step in heavily in new (insane?) physics world ? -
@KhalilArafan The death of Moore's Law is about the fundamental scale or the elements, though, so nanotech doesn't help you. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@cmuratori I think that we've been living in that world for about five years. Parallelism is the only thing making modern CPU/GPUs faster. -
@cmuratori From that article: http://www.extremetech.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/CPU-Scaling.jpg … performance per core flatlined in 2005, which is when multicore/SIMD became important. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@cmuratori we’ll be able to still double performance by adding a new CPU every few years instead of upgrading. Home clusters. -
@_psonice You got a lot of software you use day-to-day that is cluster accelerated, do you? - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.