@taradinoc @tom_forsyth @TheJare @vgebler And how is for(;;) an unambiguous alternative? Why couldn't I have made a macro that expands to ;;
@taradinoc @tom_forsyth @TheJare @vgebler If I'm blind or stupid, I'm just as likely to incorrectly type for(;;) as while(1), etc.
-
-
@taradinoc@tom_forsyth@TheJare@vgebler But any reasonable programmer never types while(1) or while(0) if they didn't mean it. -
@cmuratori@tom_forsyth@TheJare@vgebler I disagree. Everyone makes typos. - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.