@fahickman So I assume that was simply the author's (obviously) libertarian viewpoint coming through more strongly than necessary.
-
-
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori That's all it was. He only used the TSA to score anti-union, pro-privatization points. Had nothing to do with privacy.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fahickman
@fahickman I think maybe you have a different criteria for linking to articles than I do? I don't only link to articles that I would write.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori My point is that article is not actually about the TSA. The TSA is just the example (and an invalid one), not the premise.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori There are a lot of problems with the TSA but "lazy government union employees" is not one of them.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
-
Replying to @fahickman
@fahickman I mean why are you objecting to that part of the article? Do we have some reason to believe one way or the other on that?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori It's not a part. The article literally is "Unionized government employees are lazy and incompetent. Just look at the TSA."1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@fahickman That may be a bit of a broad reading of the article.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.