-
-
Replying to @fahickman
@fahickman No, not on the title alone. I tend to retweet op-eds that advocate policies I favor. I don't think it's "silly" at all.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori You agree with the author that the problem with the TSA is its unionized employees and that private firms would do things better?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fahickman
@fahickman Well, I would actually prefer no screening whatsoever, but if someone is going to do it, it should be the airline owners.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@fahickman The entire concept of warrantless searches by the government is not something I find acceptable.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@fahickman Whether they are unionized employees doesn't factor into it for me. Airplane employees are often unionized as well.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@fahickman So I assume that was simply the author's (obviously) libertarian viewpoint coming through more strongly than necessary.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori That's all it was. He only used the TSA to score anti-union, pro-privatization points. Had nothing to do with privacy.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fahickman
@fahickman I think maybe you have a different criteria for linking to articles than I do? I don't only link to articles that I would write.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@fahickman And to the author's point, private screening _was_ better than the TSA. I've flown extensively under both.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@fahickman Obviously it is a counterfactual to hypothesize what private security _would_ be like post 9/11.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.