I like when a paper lauds previous work by its own authors in the third person. "The problem was elegantly solved in [Muratori2009]..."
@rygorous @won3d @mattpharr It would lead to horrible ratholing in subsequent papers, though, as people responded and re-responded.
-
-
@rygorous@won3d@mattpharr Eg., "Although erroneously criticized in the shoddy [Giesen2005], [Muratori2003] remains the gold standard."Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.