Sad to see that the academic world is still rediscovering stuff I "published" 15 years ago: http://arxiv.org/abs/1308.3822 vs http://nothings.org/computer/source/sgrep.html …
-
-
Replying to @fahickman
@fahickman Hmm, I'm not sure this is computing. I think the problem is how an outsider can get complex ideas published in the mainstream.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nothings
@fahickman I mean, obviously Einstein managed to do it?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nothings
@fahickman I guess arguably it's my own fault for not figuring out how to boil it down to publishable quality and submitting to mainstream.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fahickman
@fahickman@nothings The ACM certainly does a wonderful job "enabling access", what with their $99 paywall.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@nothings I don't know if a fee is the end of the world. Einstein had to pay for his issues of Annalen der Physik.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@fahickman @nothings Not the end of the world, but charging $99 for access to papers that are free elsewhere is hardly "enabling access".
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.