1920x1080 really should have been 2048x1024.
-
-
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori (and naturally, 30hz should have been 32hz)1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori I would happily accept 48Hz, 72Hz and 96Hz to be congruent with the existing insanity of 24Hz film. 3*2^n is better than 60.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @tom_forsyth
@tom_forsyth No! Get those 3's out of there god damn it! If you want a ternary computer go back to 1958 :P
8:07 PM - 3 Oct 2013
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.