amen. Actually, maybe 2048x1280 RT @cmuratori: 1920x1080 really should have been 2048x1024.
-
-
@cmuratori yes, but 16:10 or 16:9 are generally more....realistic than 2:1 or 1:1 -
@KCombinator The difference is quite small. If you'd just given people 2:1 displays instead of 16:9, everyone would be used to it by now. - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.