1920x1080 really should have been 2048x1024.
-
-
@cmuratori I would happily accept 48Hz, 72Hz and 96Hz to be congruent with the existing insanity of 24Hz film. 3*2^n is better than 60. -
@tom_forsyth@cmuratori Silent films were shot at 16fps! (Chosen because it was 1 foot of film per second.)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.