@pthread @declanm @adampetrone She's specifically saying data-mining of the form the NSA is doing would be a 4th Amendment violation.
-
-
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori That's great, she's a single justice. There's 9, and court hasn't addressed that issue.@declanm@adampetrone1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pthread
@pthread@declanm@adampetrone I think this conversation may be over - if you're going to use an opinion to back up your case,2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@pthread@declanm@adampetrone and then say, "oh wait, it actually contradicts it so that opinion is just one justice", I'm out.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori you do understand how SCOTUS works, right? a justice musing and then declining to address is not decision.@declanm@adampetrone1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pthread
@pthread@declanm@adampetrone Sure - but I never brought her up, you were talking about her concurrence, not me.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@pthread@declanm@adampetrone I am saying that the _majority_ opinion in this case means it would be very easy...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@pthread@declanm@adampetrone ... to bring a 4th amendment challenge to the NSA wiretapping.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori That'd be great, or even just Congress saying that. But that's not how it is now, that's all I'm saying@declanm@adampetrone1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pthread
@pthread@declanm@adampetrone It _is_ how it is now. That ruling says that the fourth amendment covers physical intrusion...2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@pthread @declanm @adampetrone ... for the purposes of collecting _any_ kind of data that might have a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.