@cmuratori well you seem to be under impression that dissemination of info from gov to public is whistle blowing @declanm @adampetrone
-
-
Replying to @pthread
@pthread@declanm@adampetrone That is the definition, yes, along with the criteria that the information reveals government wrongdoing.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@pthread@declanm@adampetrone Violating the Constitution is pretty much the strongest way in which the government could do wrong.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori which aspect of it violates the constitution? Could you be specific?@declanm@adampetrone2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pthread
@pthread@declanm@adampetrone Sure. Collection of any data is a search under even current case law (http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/10-1259.pdf …).2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori You seem mistaken, Smith v. Maryland 1979 says call metadata not protected under 4th@declanm@adampetrone2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pthread
@pthread@declanm@adampetrone Also, I would point out that as far as we currently know, much more than just metadata is being accessed.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@pthread@declanm@adampetrone Email contents, phone call contents, etc.: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/20/fisa-court-nsa-without-warrant …2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori that's minimization procedures on how they *aren't* using US persons data.@declanm@adampetrone1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pthread
@pthread@declanm@adampetrone Not for _collection_. Read it carefully. They _collect_ everything. It only limits what they _use_.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@pthread @declanm @adampetrone The Fourth Amendment prohibits _collection at all_. It has nothing to do with use.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.