@pthread @declanm @adampetrone It requires that you obtain the information _legally_. It does not say you had to obtain it _accidentally_.
-
-
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori Right, and there's a pretty compelling argument that he obtained illegally given he took the job to steal@declanm@adampetrone1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pthread
@pthread@declanm@adampetrone But that's not in illegal. Journalists and authors do this all the time.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori and journalists and authors do not falsely obtain security clearances in order to steal documents.@declanm@adampetrone2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pthread
@pthread@declanm@adampetrone Furthermore, the whole point of the regulations is that _it is not stealing_. That's what it says.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@pthread@declanm@adampetrone That's what makes whistleblowing whistleblowing. Copying information from the government to the public.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@pthread@declanm@adampetrone That's the whole reason we have whistleblower laws, to make that not be considered theft under the law.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori Unless you believe all leaks are whistle blowing, but that sort of implies gov has no secrecy@declanm@adampetrone2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pthread
@pthread@declanm@adampetrone Leaks are whistleblowing when they reveal government violations of the Constitution, at the very least.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori the argument that this is unconstitutional isn't airtight, not den close@declanm@adampetrone1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@pthread @declanm @adampetrone It's tighter than air tight. It's hydrogen-tight.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.