Finally trying to break the habit of using ! operator with pointers instead of comparing to NULL. I blame K&R.
@dmmfix @GrumpyHook It's possible that they've added something new now, but 0 was the standard up until now.
-
-
@cmuratori@dmmfix IIRC, "0" was always correct and NULL was implementation defined, often to (void*)0, which would generate warnings/errors - Show replies
New conversation -
-
@dmmfix@GrumpyHook I'll have to go read carefully, but it looks like 0 still promotes to pointers properly?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.