@bdiamand @renderwonk That means _it is not possible_ to be legally obligated not to divulge something, because _there can't be such a law_.
@bdiamand @renderwonk So yes, I would absolutely call (a) 4 unconstitutional. Whether the rest of it is, that's trickier...
-
-
@bdiamand@renderwonk Most of the text just deals with what happens to property obtained via the disclosure, and that may be constitutional. -
@bdiamand@renderwonk It's unclear that forfeiture of _gains_ from the speech is unconstitutional, right - the BOR isn't explicit there.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.