@bdiamand @renderwonk There is no protection for shareholders in the Bill of Rights. It is neither a constitutional nor foundational issue.
-
-
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@renderwonk If you have info & legally obligated to !divulge, is there something in the Constitution to protect you?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bdiamand
@bdiamand@renderwonk This is the travesty of modern constitutional interpretation. The Bill of Rights is crystal clear on this topic:1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@bdiamand@renderwonk "Congress shall make no law" abridging the freedom of speech or the freedom of the press.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@bdiamand@renderwonk That means _it is not possible_ to be legally obligated not to divulge something, because _there can't be such a law_.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@renderwonk Do you mean it's unconstitutional to prosecute *anyone* for telling anything they know, or just the press telling?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bdiamand
@bdiamand@renderwonk You can read it just as I can :) How would _you_ read, "Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech"?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@bdiamand@renderwonk And similarly, "Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of the press"?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@renderwonk Going after ppl who tell the press secrets does not abridge press. At least not directly.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bdiamand
@bdiamand@renderwonk But it's the press that is having their records subpoena'd, and it's impossible to say that isn't a chilling effect.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@bdiamand @renderwonk Subpoena the White House / Pentagon / etc. phone records all you want. You won't hear me complain.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.