@cmuratori @renderwonk Just trying to understand limits of "no secrets = good" proposition. If some are good, govt. leak looking !always bad
@bdiamand @renderwonk That means _it is not possible_ to be legally obligated not to divulge something, because _there can't be such a law_.
-
-
@bdiamand@renderwonk If there was such a law, it is facially unconstitutional via the plainly written text of the first amendment.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@cmuratori@renderwonk Do you mean it's unconstitutional to prosecute *anyone* for telling anything they know, or just the press telling? -
@bdiamand@renderwonk You can read it just as I can :) How would _you_ read, "Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech"? - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.