So stat() (or the moral equivalent) is only 250x slower on my Windows workstation than on my MB air. Seems reasonable to me. Go NTFS!
-
-
Replying to @deplinenoise
@deplinenoise And according to@cmuratori, Linux stat() is 100x slower than Windows on NTFS. Me, I'm pretty sure you're all Doing It Wrong.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rygorous
@rygorous@deplinenoise@cmuratori am I missing a joke here or isn't this primarily fs dependant?4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mitsuhiko
Fabian Giesen Retweeted
@mitsuhiko@deplinenoise Not a joke. A while ago,@cmuratori complained about bad stat perf on Linux https://twitter.com/cmuratori/status/315538715940364289 …, now this.Fabian Giesen added,
This Tweet is unavailable.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rygorous
@rygorous@mitsuhiko@deplinenoise Both are encrypted, but Linux is using homedir encryption, whereas Windows is on Truecrypt3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@rygorous@mitsuhiko@deplinenoise And then I'll try other Linuxes (to see if just Mint is somehow doing something stupid), etc., etc.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@rygorous@mitsuhiko My test case: mmap in a list of 3000 filenames in a three-level deep dir structure, stat them all.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@deplinenoise @rygorous @mitsuhiko So, 3000 is not a very good case for the slowness. There's a cliff I think. I am at 60k+.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.