@cmuratori I see absolutely nothing objectionable in a casual reading of it (though I've prior knowing of its Repubs-object-to-538 context).
I don't think Paul Krugman actually understands probability and statistics. Like, at all: http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/04/math-is-hard/?smid=tw-NytimesKrugman&seid=auto …
-
-
-
@nothings For 1 tie + 11 Obama polls, only 5 have to be wrong. to produce his "overwhelming" result. This _will_ happen every n elections. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@cmuratori He’s an economist, not a mathematician ;)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.