Help me cry the smallest tear in the world for the OnLive "inventor" who thinks his patents are so much more important: http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/15/in-the-high-tech-patent-wars-an-inventors-lament/ …
-
-
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori Have you read them? I don't find anything outrageous in the concept of some ideas being more fundamental/important than others1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @marcosalvi
@marcosalvi By law, there can be no (valid) software patents on fundamental ideas; they'd be _math_, which is unpatentable.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori I am no expert in this matter but that doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Whatever..1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @marcosalvi
@marcosalvi It doesn't make sense to the Supreme Court either, who _still_ have not actually affirmed that software alone can be patented :)
4:11 PM - 15 Oct 2012
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.