@cmuratori Not incidentally, the or-and Boolean lattice is the same as the min-max lattice over the integers 0 and 1, etc.
-
-
Replying to @pervognsen
@pervognsen I think you mean max-min lattice, no? Or and-or lattice :) Pick one, but I think you have an analogy transposition there.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@pervognsen No, and-or = or-and too (the canonical isomorphism is given by De Morgan's laws).1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rygorous
@rygorous@pervognsen No no, I mean or=max, and and=min. I thought Per was talking about _two_ sets of equivalent lattices... no?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@pervognsen My point is that or=min and and=max works equally well!2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @rygorous
@rygorous @pervognsen OK, fair enough.
5:30 PM - 7 Oct 2012
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.