A patent examiner can't explain what a trivial patent actually covers - yet _we're_ supposed to know and not infringe?? http://www.reddit.com/r/Android/comments/ww982/iama_patent_examiner_i_want_to_answer_questions/ …
-
-
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori from that thread and the legal definition of "obvious" it seems like we need A Journal of Obvious Things to establish prior art.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori sure but how are you going to get rid of the patent system? The best solution isn't always attainable.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.