There are *so many* technologies for pulling CO2 from the air. At least some of these will scale and be profitable, and we've barely even started working on the problem, so the sky's the limit. Here's a new one:https://youtu.be/ejW4f6liOS8?t=4497 …
-
-
So all of these things are just stating what I stated, but doing it very poorly, and inaccurately. The correct statement is "if you reduced the cost of human footprint, humans would make more humans". The limit these people refer to _is_ the self-limiting lifestyle humans do.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The capability to support humans is increased by a greater % of people working more productively, which is the exact thing that is decreasing fertility. So unless lifestyles change back to a smaller working percentage, we should expect population growth to continue to slow down.
-
Though climate change technology is totally important and people who oppose it clearly don't care about solving the problem but only about feel-good activism or whatever.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.