It was well known at the time of the article, but the final report was missing. This whole thing is a disaster zone that for some reason "the media" has ignored completely, presumably because they aren't interested in things like, you know, _what is actually happening_ :)
I suppose the place I would disagree was that it was ever a conspiracy theory. My initial read of the evidence in the first few months was that it was probably a lab insertion of a cleavage site, and all evidence was and has remained consistent with that the entire time.
-
-
The only thing surprising to me was the amount of evidence we have been receiving lately. I was expecting the involved parties to have more plausible deniability than what we have seen, perhaps because I was underestimating the incompetence of the people involved :)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I agree the basic idea was plausible, but by conspiracy I mean "direct, documented evidence of government funding of virus gain of function to explicitly infect humans, that then leaked into the wild." With the caveat that all the nonsensical conspiratorial baggage is included.
-
I guess it depends on your definition of "conspiracy theory". These days I take it to me "far-fetched hypothesis very unlikely to be true", since that is how people use it. The "government-funded gain of function leaked into the wild" hypothesis was never that, IMO.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.