In all seriousness though, I read a piece from the Telegraph [1] and only came out with the idea that there was a single proposal to DARPA by a US org. Please tell me it is not obvious that there is a 2nd, funded proposal mentioned in that article.
[1]https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/09/21/wuhan-scientists-planned-releaseskin-penetrating-nanoparticles/ …
I know this is confusing. This is, of course, why I get very angry with people who dismiss COVID origins things as a "conspiracy theory", because guess what folks, even just the evidence we already have is an intricate enough conspiracy that it's not a theory, it's just fact :)
-
-
The question at this point, as far as I'm concerned, is more like "how big is this conspiracy, and in what way did it affect the pandemic", because we are still getting major documents released every week, and each one if more shocking than the next.
-
At this point we have know way of knowing how many people and institutions were involved, and we don't know to what extent they are implicated, whether it was a "harmless coverup" of some things that didn't cause the pandemic, or whether it's a blatant coverup that did, etc.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.