[1/*] Using Twitter has put reading comprehension into a very different perspective for me. I used to think reading comprehension tests were silly when I was in grade school, because they seem so easy. But I guess I took for granted the skill of understanding a paragraph of text.
-
-
[7/*] From a reading comprehension standpoint, this is very straightforward (to me). But Twitter is now _littered_ with threads of people who are all over the map on what they are asserting. It's insane. I guess Twitter is where people who failed reading comprehension end up?
Show this thread -
[8/*] It is so frustrating that it makes me want to make a weekly show where all I do is recap what the subjects, verbs, and objects of the week's news sentences were, because apparently nobody can handle that if it gets even slightly complicated.
Show this thread -
[9/*] Like it seems that people on Twitter can only handle one subject. Like there was a grant proposal. They could handle that. But once there were two grant proposals, that's the end of it. Their brain can't track two similar things at the same time, so it's over?
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You don't really need to read anything since Fauci is on camera being questioned . The Senate has the same problem as twitter then as their questions were aligned with Fauci / NIH paid money for gain of function research. Other scientists backed that up . There will be confusion
-
But I'm not talking about any judgements here. I'm literally just talking about whether people could understand that there were two grants. Many people on Twitter just completely missed that. They are not able to comprehend the articles well enough to understand that.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.