I agree with this so much that 100% is not really sufficient. The current science publishing system is worse than useless - it actively retards the progress of science, sometimes catastrophically.https://twitter.com/mbeisen/status/1451233646761824284 …
-
-
Giving access to the raw data of every experiments could be a good start. Before trying to replicate, you could already check for any flaw or dishonest interpretation.
-
Not tying researchers career and subventions to the number of papers published could also help a lot in reducing the number of useless and dishonest papers.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Same goes for data centers
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.