I agree with this so much that 100% is not really sufficient. The current science publishing system is worse than useless - it actively retards the progress of science, sometimes catastrophically.https://twitter.com/mbeisen/status/1451233646761824284 …
-
-
Doing replication is expensive. Not doing replication is far, far more expensive.
-
Giving access to the raw data of every experiments could be a good start. Before trying to replicate, you could already check for any flaw or dishonest interpretation.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.