I agree with this so much that 100% is not really sufficient. The current science publishing system is worse than useless - it actively retards the progress of science, sometimes catastrophically.https://twitter.com/mbeisen/status/1451233646761824284 …
-
-
In an era where publishing to the entire world is free, instant, and ubiquitous, the pipeline should start there, and then focus on whether anyone can _replicate_ a result from the publication, not on people's opinions of what they read. People's opinions are worthless :)
-
So, instant dissemination, followed by "peer replication", to me that is how the system should begin. There are plenty of details to work out, but the scientific process of the future does not look like chosen-few-peer-review.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.