Could you name at least one?
-
-
Replying to @eximius @daddyWallenberg
Just Google them? There are literally hundreds of pages on-line talking about HR training practices. It varies considerably by jurisdiction because a lot of them are pop psychology ideas that have been laundered into corporate America by lawsuits: https://www.google.com/search?q=hr+required+training …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cmuratori @daddyWallenberg
But I'm asking for your personal experience, not generalized lists...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @eximius @daddyWallenberg
I run my own business and we have 2 employees, so we are exempted. The minimum is 12 (or 15, dep.) employees before the law compels you to do these trainings. It's one of the reasons Molly Rocket will never have more than 11 employees unless we expatriate :P
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cmuratori @daddyWallenberg
Ah, okay, thanks for the background! Was curious which topics you ran into that bothered you specifically, but I see they don't affect you
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @eximius @daddyWallenberg
Well, all of it bothers me, there isn't a specific topic. In my opinion, if the government wants to require a training, that it should provide that training, not indirectly force companies to do so.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Also, I strongly object to the idea that certain people's ideas of what's important get trained and others' do not. For example, there is no corporate training that you aren't supposed to kill one of your fellow employees, right. But somehow, we don't consider that negligent.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori @daddyWallenberg
Maybe it's only to cover things that aren't already covered by law? Murder is already well understood as being illegal.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @eximius @daddyWallenberg
No, the trainings are specifically there so that the company can avoid civil lawsuits. That's where this whole system came from. In my opinion, "you didn't make your employees aware of this" should never have been part of it, that should have been the government's job.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori @daddyWallenberg
That feels like something a company lawyer would push, a choice of the company, and not the government.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
They have no choice. There is a thing called an "affirmative defense" that you need for these lawsuits, and having the trainings is a big part of it. The courts forced their hands. The "company lawyer" in this case is 100% correct :)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.