[1/*] Just to clarify, in the hopes of getting less lunacy in my mentions: I am a professional programmer. I have implemented novel hash functions before. I work on server code. I long ago read and completely understand the original BitCoin paper.
-
-
[3/*] Either there are or aren't solid, thorough arguments for why blockchain is a necessary cost to bear for economic consensus protocols and cannot be substituted with weaker, cheaper protocols, or there aren't. I want to hear them. I am not currently hearing them.
Show this thread -
[4/*] What I will be doing in the interviews I plan to conduct is asking highly technical people to walk through exactly what they think blockchain technically provides that other consensus protocols would not provide.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.