It's one thing to say, "Yes, we know there may have been work going on to insert Furin cleavage sites into SARS viruses, and that definitely could've caused this pandemic, but we don't think that's what happened." It's another to intentionally conceal _all_ of this information.
-
-
Show this thread
-
I don't really think it's sunk in yet just how severely this situation will damage scientific credibility in the long run. This is _many_, _very prominent_ scientists, who all knew about this, and not a single one was willing to come forward and tell the truth. Not. One.
Show this thread -
And this is just one of _many_ pieces of evidence that have come to light that reflect extremely poorly on scientists widely quoted by the mainstream media to support a randomly selected narrative, for no real reason whatsoever.
Show this thread -
It does not matter where the virus came from at this point. It might as well have come from a Cracker Jack box. The behavior of high-level scientists on display has been so egregiously duplicitous as to make it basically impossible to regain trust.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Because Fauci IS science, and to challenge him is to challenge SCIENCE ITSELF! He says it's not technically gain of function, so there we go, problem solved.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is there any evidence to confirm this document is real and not a fabrication? A quick Google search leads to “DRASTIC Research”, which doesn’t exactly scream “credible”.
-
We will - I assume - have to wait for a complete FOIA lawsuit for verification, because presumably none of the people on it will confirm it. None of them have denied it, either, of course - which you would think they would, if it were inauthentic.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.