Evidently we're going to have a debate about vaccine mandates and abortion at the same time--that is, both culture war tribes are simultaneously going to take both positions on the rights to medical privacy and "my body my choice" autonomy
-
-
Sure, but that seems more consistent with Conor's framing that "the question would be how privacy vs protection of life would be balanced wrt a vaccine" than with saying the right to privacy ends with vaccination and it's not an open question.
-
I guess I would just say, I doubt it? Or rather, that framing suggests that the state would be going to court with a toss-up question. But I don't think it would. I think it would be going to court with a slam dunk. "It's a pandemic, everyone agrees, we vaccinated for it." Done.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
[Tangentially, one thing that _could_ happen, is that I don't know that anyone has ever articulated the specific standard a state must meet for something like a vaccine. Is it strict scrutiny? Is it intermediate? Is it rational basis? SCOTUS might well be asked that question.]
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.