Can someone please explain. If I take risks, invest money, hire people, and manage my business in such a way that it becomes one of the dominant platforms for app distribution, why am I not free to charge whatever fee I want to make things happen IN the platform that I built?
-
-
And so that puts the onus on Apple to explain how, effectively, the consumer would be harmed, long-term, by allowing Epic to give them a better deal on services.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Interesting. Who is to decide that something is “overpriced”? Also, selling things at some margin is always “harming” customers in some way.
-
The trial is what determines whether it is overpriced. Economic experts are called to testify, and copious evidence is presented. Sometimes - as is the case in these trials for sure - things like direct evidence of employees' internal emails saying the product is overpriced.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I’m trying to imagine I managed to produce something highly efficiently and now not being able to attach whatever rules I want to it when selling it. Sounds super weird. Although obviously as a customer I’d benefit.
-
But it's not weird, you just haven't thought about the history :) "Attach whatever rules I want when selling it". What do you mean by that? Do you literally mean "whatever rules"? What is the limiting principle?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.