[9/*] So this leads to obvious depressing conclusion: the more people engage in computing, the more it becomes just like mainstream media. Because if anything else were to be true, it would have already been true of the media that came before it :(
Either you believe that people should have some agency, and that they can decide what to read and what to believe, or you don't. If you do, why do you think you should be able to interfere with them? If you don't, why should they be on-line at all?
-
-
What is the point of letting people communicate with each other if what you really wanted was for them just to believe what you want them to believe? What is the point of the internet if it's curated? Did we even need it, then?
-
But the internet is curated by government and seems like you fine with it? I'm talking about removing illegal stuff like drugs and etc.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.