Well, you kinda have such internet. 4chan and darknet are mostly unmoderated, and, well, there is a lot of illegal, unethical or just gross stuff. And it's clear, why people want this stuff to be removed.
Redress of injury is fine. If you want to have a court system that can deal with issues arising from speech after the fact, that's fine. But that is not "moderation". Moderation is a pre-crime unit - people who decide what can be said _before_ the results are seen.
-
-
What's the basic difference between laws and rules on twitter? Both are written by some 'high authority person", which is chosen by people (via elections or by using one platform over another), both saying what cannot be done.
-
Is that a serious question? I'm honestly not sure. If it's a serious question: representative democracy, individual rights guaranteed by the constitution, right to due process, right to appeal through a complete Article III court system?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.