[9/*] So this leads to obvious depressing conclusion: the more people engage in computing, the more it becomes just like mainstream media. Because if anything else were to be true, it would have already been true of the media that came before it :(
-
Show this thread
-
[10/*] So you don't have to wonder what the future of communication looks like! It looks just like the past. If books were banned, movies will be banned; if movies were banned, YouTubes will be banned.
2 replies 2 retweets 54 likesShow this thread -
[11/*] So computers didn't really offer anything different. The only thing they were was _new_. And something new has a brief period when the majority of people aren't using it, so their desire to force people to conform isn't applied.
3 replies 6 retweets 76 likesShow this thread -
[12/*] I'm not sure if that makes me more or less depressed. It's a depressing thought, but maybe also one that is slightly motivating: it means we can always make a new - albeit shortly lived - place free from the demands of social conformity.
1 reply 2 retweets 51 likesShow this thread -
[13/*] We just make a new medium for communication, and for a brief time, before it becomes popular, people will be able to be themselves there. The depressing part is, of course, that it will only last for a short while.
19 replies 2 retweets 71 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @cmuratori
Well, you kinda have such internet. 4chan and darknet are mostly unmoderated, and, well, there is a lot of illegal, unethical or just gross stuff. And it's clear, why people want this stuff to be removed.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @leviska0
If it's illegal, it's a matter for the FBI. If it's "unethical" - well, who decided that? You? And if it's "just gross", then, don't look at it? Why would it matter if someone else is posting gross stuff on a Twitter feed? Just don't subscribe to that feed?
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
Well then why are you telling me this in highly moderated twitter, and not in anarchy-like 4chan (or other service)? BTW I'm not telling, that I agree with twitter decisions, but I'm just curious, why are you still using it
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @leviska0
Because you are not on 4chan. That's the point. That was the entire point of my thread, if you read it? Once you get to the point where you can communicate with the majority of people, that platform will become regulated.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori @leviska0
It can either be regulated by the platform itself, or the government will step in and do it, etc. But the only way to have actual free speech, AFAICT, is to not have anyone listening.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Another way to say this is, we could all move to 4chan right now and start talking to each other there. But if we did, I guarantee you it would become heavily moderated within a few years, by force if necessary.
-
-
Replying to @cmuratori @leviska0
It's not that 4chan is unmoderated so people don't go there. It's that people don't go there, so 4chan is unmoderated. It works the other way around.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cmuratori
Don't you think, that a lot of people actually want moderation? They don't want to see hardcore injures and people hating each other, so they stay here. Don't you think, that people use twitter _because_ it's moderated? Again, I'm just asking, not saying that this is the truth
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.