That didn't last long
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why do desktop processors need this kind of aggressive "performance" and "efficiency" cores thing? They're plugged into the wall…
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
so wait, the instructions for them are still on the core, they're just "physically fused off" for no reason? very cool and consumer friendly of them
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ouch! Well... I hope for the imminent demise of x86, and welcome the ARM SVE (Scalable Vector Extension) for a 2048bit wide SIMD future. We've been riding that aging patched silicon for far too long now. (Gate A20) Unfortunately, MS-Windows is keeping x86 alive.
-
I feel like once we get a better alternative to Linux for an ARM chip OS (I don't count OS X as a better alternative to Linux). Then we might start to see the decline of Windows and x86 as a whole
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If I'd have to pull a guess out of my hat, I'd say this is a very aggressive (in a hatchet swinging way) to reduce power use.
-
Nope I think they hit an HW errata too late for tape out fixing so they just "disable" it. And as this chips are for gamers they do not care of AVX512 wither for now. I think the same chips for WS/Server will have AVX512
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
