That ruling was later overturned, because it was clearly not in keeping with the ideals of the First Amendment.
A) This is exactly what I am talking about when I say we have to wait to see when a case makes it to SCOTUS, because PragerU is a Ninth Circuit case, not a SCOTUS case, and B) Halleck was 5/4, and C) Halleck doesn't deal with Section 230, DMCA, etc., or political speech.
-
-
There are many, many reasons why Halleck is not the end of the story with respect to what will happen with on-line platforms. I am in no way trying to predict what the Supreme Court will do. Nobody knows, they change their mind pretty frequently.
-
But finally, as for your know-it-all comment, did you fail to notice that I ALREADY CITED THAT CASE before you brought it up? Or were you too busy on Google trying to find something?pic.twitter.com/1vkNvIug2g
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Halleck explicitly impacts how political speech functions, and directly stops your Marsh argument.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.